Hootsuite
Social media management platform for scheduling, monitoring, and team collaboration.
The verdict
A reliable workhorse for social scheduling and team management, but increasingly squeezed between cheaper simple tools and more capable enterprise platforms.
Best for
Mid-market teams managing many social accounts with approval workflows
Not great for
Small teams on a budget or those wanting deep B2B social selling features
Hootsuite was one of the first social media management platforms, and it still holds a significant share of the market. Its core strength is managing multiple social accounts from one dashboard with scheduling, a unified inbox, and team collaboration features.
For mid-market GTM teams, the approval workflow system is the most relevant feature. You can set up content queues where team members draft posts, managers review and approve them, and everything publishes on schedule. This matters when you have multiple people posting on behalf of the company and need brand consistency.
Bulk scheduling through CSV upload is useful for teams that plan content in batches. If your content team creates a month’s worth of social posts in advance, you can upload them all at once rather than scheduling each post individually. The content calendar provides a visual overview of what is going live across which channels on which days.
The social listening add-on tracks mentions, keywords, and sentiment across social networks. It is functional but not as deep as dedicated listening platforms. For basic brand monitoring and competitor tracking, it gets the job done.
Where Hootsuite falls short for GTM teams is the lack of connection to revenue data. Social engagement metrics stay inside Hootsuite. There is no native way to see which social interactions influenced deals or contributed to pipeline. You also cannot tie social engagement to specific contacts in your CRM without building custom integrations.
Pricing has been a sore point. Hootsuite eliminated its free tier and raised prices across the board. At $99/mo for the Professional plan (one user, ten social accounts), it is no longer the budget option it once was. Teams that just need simple scheduling may find better value in tools like Buffer.
Key features
Post scheduling across multiple social networks
Unified inbox for social messages and mentions
Team approval workflows with content calendars
Social analytics and custom reporting
Social listening and brand monitoring
Ad management for social campaigns
Content curation with RSS feed integration
Bulk scheduling with CSV upload
Pros and cons
Pros
- + Supports a wide range of social networks including LinkedIn, X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok
- + Approval workflows and team roles make it suitable for multi-person social teams
- + Bulk scheduling saves time for teams publishing high volumes of content
- + Long track record and mature platform with extensive documentation
Cons
- - Pricing has increased significantly and no longer offers a free tier
- - Analytics depth does not match dedicated tools like Sprout Social
- - UI can feel dated compared to newer competitors
- - No connection to CRM or pipeline data for social attribution
Details
Pricing model
paid
From $99/mo
Team size
mid market
Founded
2008
Headquarters
Vancouver, Canada
Integrations
Compliance
GTMStack includes Social Management natively
No need for a separate tool. GTMStack's Social Management is built into the platform, so your data flows through one system.
Ready to simplify your GTM stack?
GTMStack replaces point solutions with one unified platform. Use native tools or connect the ones you already have.