Make
Visual automation platform with advanced data routing and transformation for ops teams.
The verdict
More powerful than Zapier for complex workflows at a lower price, but the learning curve is steeper.
Best for
Ops teams building complex visual automations with data transformation
Not great for
Non-technical users wanting simple one-click integrations
Make (formerly Integromat) is the automation platform that ops teams gravitate toward once they outgrow Zapier’s linear workflow model. The visual scenario builder displays your entire automation as a flowchart, with modules connected by lines that show exactly how data moves between steps. For anyone who thinks in systems, this is immediately more intuitive than Zapier’s sequential list format.
The data transformation capabilities are where Make genuinely differentiates. You can map fields using functions, parse JSON and XML natively, iterate over arrays, and aggregate results, all without writing code. This matters for GTM use cases like enriching lead records with data from multiple sources, transforming webhook payloads from event platforms, or building custom reporting pipelines that pull from several APIs.
Pricing is notably cheaper than Zapier. The free tier gives you 1,000 operations per month (10x Zapier’s free allowance), and paid plans start at $9/mo. Operations are counted per module execution, similar to Zapier’s task model, but the lower per-operation cost means complex multi-step scenarios do not blow up your bill as quickly.
The trade-off is accessibility. Make’s data mapping interface uses expression syntax that takes time to learn. Non-technical team members who were productive in Zapier within an hour may need a few days to get comfortable with Make. The module library is also smaller, at roughly 1,800 apps compared to Zapier’s 6,000+, though Make covers most mainstream GTM tools.
For GTM ops teams that build and maintain dozens of automations, Make offers better economics and more capability. For teams that just need a handful of simple connections, the additional complexity may not be worth it.
Key features
Visual scenario builder with drag-and-drop modules
Advanced data mapping and transformation
Routers for parallel branching paths
Error handling with automatic retry and break handlers
Aggregators and iterators for array processing
Data stores for persistent key-value storage
Webhook triggers and HTTP modules
Scheduling with minute-level granularity
Pros and cons
Pros
- + Significantly cheaper per operation than Zapier at scale
- + Visual canvas shows full workflow topology at a glance
- + Advanced data transformation without needing code
- + Error handling and retry logic is built into the platform
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially for data mapping
- - Fewer total integrations than Zapier (1,800+ vs 6,000+)
- - Debugging complex scenarios can be time-consuming
- - UI can feel slow with very large scenarios
Details
Pricing model
freemium
From $9/mo
Team size
small team
Founded
2012
Headquarters
Prague, Czech Republic
Integrations
Compliance
GTMStack includes Workflow Automation natively
No need for a separate tool. GTMStack's Workflow Automation is built into the platform, so your data flows through one system.
Other Workflow & Integration Automation tools
Ready to simplify your GTM stack?
GTMStack replaces point solutions with one unified platform. Use native tools or connect the ones you already have.