Pipeline Review Scorecard
A structured pipeline review scorecard for weekly deal reviews. Score opportunities on engagement, authority, timeline, and fit to improve forecasting.
Use this scorecard during weekly pipeline review meetings to evaluate deal health consistently across the team. It replaces subjective gut-feel forecasting with a standardized scoring system that gives leadership reliable commit numbers and surfaces at-risk deals before they slip.
Pipeline Review Meeting Structure
Frequency: Weekly, same day/time every week Duration: 45-60 minutes Attendees: Sales manager, AEs with active pipeline, RevOps (optional: VP Sales for monthly deep dive)
Agenda:
| Time | Activity |
|---|---|
| 0-5 min | Pipeline snapshot: total qualified pipeline, coverage ratio, new opps this week |
| 5-35 min | Deal-by-deal review (focus on Commit and Best Case deals) |
| 35-45 min | At-risk deal action plans |
| 45-50 min | Next week’s priorities and asks |
Deal Scoring Criteria
Score each opportunity on 6 dimensions using a 1-5 scale. Total possible score: 30.
1. Champion Strength (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Champion is actively selling internally, has shared the internal evaluation timeline, and has introduced you to the economic buyer |
| 4 | Champion is engaged, responds within 24 hours, and has confirmed the evaluation process |
| 3 | Champion attends meetings and answers questions but does not proactively advance the deal |
| 2 | Contact is responsive but has no internal influence or is not the right person |
| 1 | No identified champion, or champion has gone silent for 10+ days |
2. Economic Buyer Access (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Economic buyer has attended a meeting and expressed support |
| 4 | Economic buyer is aware of the evaluation and has approved next steps |
| 3 | Champion confirms who the economic buyer is and believes they will support |
| 2 | Economic buyer is identified but not yet engaged |
| 1 | Economic buyer is unknown or champion is unable to provide access |
3. Decision Timeline (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Signed mutual action plan with specific dates for each step. Contract deadline confirmed by economic buyer. |
| 4 | Verbal close date confirmed by champion. Key milestones (security review, legal review, budget approval) have dates. |
| 3 | General timeline communicated (“this quarter”) but no specific milestone dates. |
| 2 | Prospect says “no rush” or “we’ll get to it when we can.” |
| 1 | No timeline discussed, or previous timeline has already slipped. |
4. Compelling Event (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Hard deadline: contract renewal, board mandate, compliance requirement, or system end-of-life with a specific date |
| 4 | Strong business driver: new initiative launching, team doubling, entering new market |
| 3 | Pain is acknowledged but no specific event forcing action |
| 2 | Problem exists but they have a workaround |
| 1 | No identified reason to act now versus 6 months from now |
5. Technical Fit (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Completed technical validation (POC, pilot, or sandbox evaluation). Technical team has signed off. |
| 4 | Demo completed. Prospect confirmed the product meets core requirements. Integration requirements are clear. |
| 3 | Discovery completed. Requirements are mapped. No major red flags but no technical validation yet. |
| 2 | Initial demo done but key questions remain (integrations, data model, security). |
| 1 | No discovery completed or significant technical gaps identified. |
6. Competitive Position (1-5)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | We are the only vendor being evaluated, or finalist confirmed |
| 4 | Multi-vendor eval but champion has indicated we are preferred |
| 3 | Multi-vendor eval, unclear where we stand |
| 2 | Competitor is incumbent or has an existing relationship |
| 1 | Competitor is preferred or we are a column filler |
Scorecard Template
| Opportunity | Amount | Stage | Close Date | Champion | Buyer | Timeline | Event | Tech Fit | Competition | Total (/30) | Forecast Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{deal}} | ${{X}} | S3 | {{date}} | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /30 | |
| {{deal}} | ${{X}} | S4 | {{date}} | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /5 | /30 |
Forecast Category Assignment
| Total Score | Category | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| 25-30 | Commit | Will close this quarter with > 90% confidence. All criteria verified. |
| 20-24 | Best Case | Strong deal, likely to close, but 1-2 dimensions need strengthening. |
| 15-19 | Pipeline | Active evaluation, but too many unknowns for a forecast. |
| 10-14 | Early Stage | Discovery phase. Not ready for forecast inclusion. |
| Below 10 | At Risk | Stalled or missing critical elements. Needs intervention or disqualification. |
Deal Review Questions (Per Opportunity)
Use these questions during the review to pressure-test each deal:
Champion & Authority:
- “When did you last speak to the champion? What did they tell you about internal progress?”
- “Has the economic buyer confirmed the budget exists for this quarter?”
- “Who else is involved in the decision? Have you spoken with them?”
Timeline & Event:
- “What happens if they do not buy this quarter? What is the cost of inaction?”
- “Have any dates slipped since last week? Why?”
- “Is there a signed mutual action plan? Can you screen-share it?”
Competition:
- “Who else are they evaluating? How do you know?”
- “What did they say when you asked about their decision criteria?”
Next Steps:
- “What is the literal next step, and when is it scheduled?”
- “What could cause this deal to slip? What are you doing to prevent it?”
Pipeline Health Metrics
Track these aggregate metrics across the full pipeline each week:
| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Qualified Pipeline ($) | |||
| Pipeline Coverage (vs. Quota) | |||
| Commit Total ($) | |||
| Best Case Total ($) | |||
| Average Deal Score (all opps) | |||
| Deals that moved forward (stage) | |||
| Deals that moved backward (stage) | |||
| New pipeline added ($) | |||
| Pipeline churned (lost/disqualified) ($) |
Pipe this data into your GTM metrics dashboard for automated weekly snapshots.
Post-Review Action Items Template
| Deal | Issue Identified | Action Required | Owner | Due Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{deal}} | No economic buyer access | Champion to schedule intro call | AE: {{name}} | {{date}} |
| {{deal}} | Timeline slipped 2 weeks | Send mutual action plan with updated dates | AE: {{name}} | {{date}} |
Review action item completion at the start of next week’s meeting — do not let items carry over more than one week. Use your workflow automation to create reminders automatically from CRM stage changes.
How to Customize
- For enterprise sales teams (6+ month cycles), add a “Procurement & Legal” scoring dimension (1-5) that tracks MSA status, security review completion, and procurement process clarity. These are the stages where enterprise deals die silently.
- For high-velocity sales teams (< 30 day cycles), simplify to 4 dimensions: Champion, Timeline, Technical Fit, and Competition. Remove Economic Buyer Access and Compelling Event since they add overhead without improving forecast accuracy at shorter cycle lengths.
- Calibrate scores quarterly. Pull historical data on deals that scored 25-30 but did not close. Identify which dimension was the false positive and tighten the scoring criteria for that dimension. Your analytics system should track score-to-outcome correlation over time.
Related templates
Attribution Model Framework
A marketing attribution model framework covering first-touch, last-touch, multi-touch, and custom models. Includes setup steps and comparison guide.
ScorecardDeal Review Scorecard
A scorecard for assessing deal quality and progression during pipeline reviews and forecast calls.
FrameworkGTM Metrics Dashboard Template
A GTM metrics dashboard template with KPIs across pipeline, marketing, sales, and customer success. Built for RevOps and GTM operations teams.
Want the how-to behind this template?
Check out our playbooks for step-by-step process guides.