GTMStack
Video Selling & Demo Platforms
Video Selling & Demo Platforms
Loom logo

Loom

Async video messaging tool for screen recordings, walkthroughs, and team communication.

Visit website freemium small-team

The verdict

The go-to tool for async video communication across teams, but lacks the sales-specific features that Vidyard offers.

Best for

Async communication across sales, CS, and internal teams

Not great for

Teams needing sales-specific analytics like viewer engagement tracking per prospect

Loom was acquired by Atlassian in 2023 and remains the most widely used async video tool. Its strength is simplicity: hit record, capture your screen and face, and share a link. The recording-to-sharing loop is faster than any competitor, which is why Loom has seen adoption across sales, customer success, engineering, and product teams.

For GTM teams, Loom fills specific gaps. Sales reps use it for video prospecting and deal updates. CS teams record onboarding walkthroughs and feature explanations. Managers create async standups and training content. The tool works everywhere because it is designed as a general-purpose communication tool, not a sales-specific platform.

Automatic transcription is a practical feature. Every recording gets a searchable transcript with timestamps, which means recipients can scan the content without watching the full video. Loom AI adds summaries and extracts action items, making longer recordings more digestible.

The editing tools are basic but functional. You can trim the beginning and end, stitch clips together, and add CTAs. For quick walkthroughs and messages, this is enough. For polished sales demos or marketing content, you would need a dedicated editor.

Where Loom falls short for sales teams is analytics. You can see who viewed a video and basic engagement stats, but there is no CRM integration to track prospect-level engagement over time. Vidyard wins here because it was built specifically for the sales video use case and feeds viewer data into Salesforce and HubSpot.

Pricing is competitive at $12.50/user/mo on the Business plan. The free tier limits you to 25 videos at 5 minutes each, which is tight for active use. Enterprise plans add SSO, advanced admin controls, and Salesforce integration.

If your team needs a single async video tool that works across departments, Loom is the default choice. If you specifically need sales prospecting analytics and CRM-connected engagement tracking, Vidyard is the better fit.

Key features

Screen and webcam recording with instant sharing

Automatic transcription and closed captions

Video trimming and editing in-browser

Comments and emoji reactions on videos

Custom branding and password protection

Workspace analytics and engagement metrics

Loom AI for summaries and action items

Embeddable videos for docs and websites

Pros and cons

Pros

  • + Fastest recording-to-sharing workflow of any video tool
  • + Works well across every department, not just sales
  • + Automatic transcription makes videos searchable and accessible
  • + Atlassian backing ensures ongoing product investment

Cons

  • - Sales-specific analytics are limited compared to Vidyard
  • - No CRM integration for tracking prospect-level engagement
  • - Free tier limits videos to 5 minutes and 25 total
  • - Not designed for interactive demos or product walkthroughs

Details

Pricing model

freemium

From $12.50/user/mo

Team size

small team

Founded

2015

Headquarters

San Francisco, CA

Integrations

SlackNotionGmailGitHubJiraConfluenceGoogle DriveFigma

Compliance

SOC 2GDPR

Ready to simplify your GTM stack?

GTMStack replaces point solutions with one unified platform. Use native tools or connect the ones you already have.

Get GTM insights delivered weekly

Join operators who get actionable playbooks, benchmarks, and product updates every week.